So, there's no mad rush of early adopters for stereoscopic (aka 3D) TVs. Hardly surprising as there is almost no content, the glasses are very expensive, and the viewing experience is not very comfortable. There was a time when companies could count on the early adopters for initial sales of new products, but you still have to give them a reason to buy. Not to mention that glasses-free stereoscopic TVs are just around the corner, but even those have problems as the viewer position is still important.
The average consumer will decide in the end whether stereoscopic TVs are a gimmick worth buying. I've already decided it's not.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment